今天廢話不多說, 我們直接來看看XFX GTX BLACK EDITION V.S XFX GTX 275, NVIDIA同門師兄弟大對決.
今天的主角之一 , XFX GTX 260 BLACK EDITION
不再是公版卡的風扇, 也就表示這張是自製卡
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4595/b4595c9007bf600cf130fe8414d47b256322c3d3" alt=""
風扇的部分, 採用的是PWM可調轉速風扇
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3768/e3768472e90910fd5a7d25e4897eeb7110d39e41" alt=""
仍舊採用雙6PIN供電
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5165/c5165cdfe2e2f77fc060bb4967437f611a639b06" alt=""
支援THREE-WAY SLI
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/011a9/011a90618981c02a2022a95636b9481fc3d2dc3e" alt=""
PCB的部分
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d844/2d84410f23bd8f88441a8d1dcc2b49d5e7dda5a8" alt=""
雙DVI以及TV-OUT
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b238/4b2389df4b603edd535aa22d86e7630af5d3d54c" alt=""
好大一顆 G 200 – 103 – B3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff5ba/ff5ba9b301fd60a29ca5a4d46d156560855b9b82" alt=""
NVIDIA NVIO控制晶片組
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c821/1c8215854f94a631a20688c19b1a583cc24fd741" alt=""
SAMSUNG出品的GDDR3顆粒
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ebc2/8ebc2ac028f42e97ec17c87e983afa76b46106cb" alt=""
來看看XFX GTX 260 BLACK EDITION的GPU - Z
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dda0/7dda099e9b775129c5e3f9b7ecf2504b2955e274" alt=""
XFX GTX 275的GPU-Z
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/049c8/049c8e0399b76a8e31bf23f22f3d9e57c8d25edc" alt=""
GTX 275跟 GTX 260 BLACK EDITON間的差異
1. GPU CLOCK – 640MHz V.S 680MHz
2. Memory – 1134MHz V.S 1000MHz
3. Shader – 1404MHz V.S 1466MHz
4. BandWidth – 127.0 GB /s V.S 112.0 GB/s
5. Shaders – 240SP V.S 216SP
6. TextFillrates – 41.0 Texel/s V.S 43.5 Texel/s
測試平台
Intel Core i7 920 O.C 3.6G
Foxconn X58 Bloodrage
Corsair DDR3 1866 CL 7-8-7-20
SEAGATE 7200.12 1TB
ANTEC TP 1000W 80 PLUS
XFX GTX 260 BLACK EDITION
XFX GTX 275
WIN 7 RC 7100 with Nvidia 185.50
我們先來看看3D VANTAGE的分數
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/070e4/070e45e5a08d2065759eedf568a9b85aa21bbc93" alt=""
順便跑了一下有支援CUDA的Nurien
GTX 275
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b900d/b900d8460e04645c09962f5c8e7e0fd976f59225" alt=""
GTX 260 BLACK
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de723/de723677712f6bc834e8276bfd193e0065ecac44" alt=""
最後是Unigine Tropic
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0fbb9/0fbb9f116db23089bdde10d9b86c95a336cd9f2f" alt=""
接下來, 我們來看看遊戲的BENCHMARK
Crysis Warhead
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85ec8/85ec80ed990bb8b0341b56ee8acb73da714dd28a" alt=""
FarCry 2
GTX 275
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/334a8/334a8916b16a05b6ecdb90803d7dc52064eca4b5" alt=""
GTX 260
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a06f/7a06f8e80e00940eb239dd4c17df179c023953ff" alt=""
耗電的部分
XFX GTX 275
Idle : 185 w
1.4 A
37.9度
Full : 399W
8.4 A
69.2度
XFX GTX 260 BLACK EDITION
Idle : 210 w
1.8 A
43.1度
Full : 395W
9.7 A
60.8度
GTX 260 55nm 216SP在各方面都略GTX 275遜色, 這是不意外的事情. 不過, 透過CRYSIS WARHEAD的BENCHMARK, 可以很容易發現, 兩者的差異其實真的很小, 不到兩張FPS, 對於許多USER來說, 應該是在可以接受的範圍內. 另外在耗電的部分, 似乎各有勝負.
以上簡單的測試, 希望能讓大家在選購上有一些幫助, 謝謝收看