2007/2到现在经过两个月左右的时间,AMD一连有好几次降价的动作
AMD把之前效能较低于Intel C2D阵营的弱处,藉着65nm处理器量产与低价位的产品策略补强
特别是近期推出的X2 3600+ 65nm 512K,市场上双核超低售价只有75美金
不管在升级或是装机市场,这几个月来一直有着非常热烈的销售量
测试使用的双方阵营之CPU
两款价位相差不大,但实际上还是AMD X2 5000+价格较低一点
主角上场
左方代表 Intel Core 2 Duo E6400
右方代表 AMD Athlon64 X2 5000+
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/893f5/893f53ab5338511e79ad9419cd8bc567c15e2a49" alt=""
使用之主机板
AMD
DFI INFINITY NF ULTRAII-M2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a211/1a211f7e9c8af6a93ae1a2134bb14f5cb3080f76" alt=""
Intel
MSI P6N SLI Platinum
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa42a/aa42ae6ba821a18cdcbaa332989e3f376962d1ca" alt=""
使用之DDRII
CORSAIR TWIN2X2048-10000C5DF
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/574f8/574f8b52595572f57a8039cb8485eedadfed248a" alt=""
使用之VGA
ELSA GLADIAC 790GS PH2 256DT
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa982/fa982e34b3159e9e41b28d159ea7e5e1e408f806" alt=""
平台配备列表
AMD
CPU:AMD Athlon64 X2 5000+
MB: DFI INFINITY ULTRAII-M2
DRAM:CORSAIR TWIN2X2048-10000C5DF
VGA:ELSA GLADIAC 790GS PH2 256DT
HD:Seagate 7200.7 80GB
POWER:Corsair HX620W Modular Power Supply
Cooler:TT Big Typhoon VX
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff8ff/ff8ffaa7fe0676338feed66ad385da7a920fd097" alt=""
Intel
CPU:Intel Core 2 Duo E6400
MB: MSI P6N SLI Platinum
DRAM:CORSAIR TWIN2X2048-10000C5DF
VGA:ELSA GLADIAC 790GS PH2 256DT
HD:Seagate 7200.7 80GB
POWER:Corsair HX620W Modular Power Supply
Cooler:TT Big Typhoon VX
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9630/f9630b0a391921fe872cb1cebdb3111db33206a0" alt=""
接下来就是时脉资讯
处理器
Intel Core 2 Duo E6400:266X8=>2133Mhz
AMD Athlon64 X2 5000+:200X13=>2600Mhz(主机板预设有些误差为2612Mhz)
记忆体
BIOS设定皆为DDRII 800 CL3 3-3-9
AM2某些倍频有DRAM除频的问题,所以实际运作为DDRII 746 CL3 3-3-9 1T
剩下的除了主机板晶片组外,其他配备皆相同:)
两方测试平台都使用Nvidia晶片组,我想这样会比较相似
不过Intel nForce 6系列与AMD nForce 4系列的落差,也无法避免
PCMARK2005
Intel
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eff4a/eff4ab6cedcc32290d1234bd38920ddd1f8ffce0" alt=""
AMD
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24409/2440964a2184f9cba2a4b76ae5c7fcbe6e863997" alt=""
CPU Source
Intel:5479
AMD:5334
CrystalMark
Intel
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3409/f3409a0aa8c3eb736ac723c81044c652c2d256af" alt=""
AMD
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4610/f4610477c80b19f0368b406575b4fedc5137dcb3" alt=""
ALU
Intel:18969
AMD:19468
FPU
Intel:22702
AMD:22490
CINEBENCH 9.5
Intel
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6fe0/b6fe05a0970438e81125106981bbb61be318726b" alt=""
AMD
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69a08/69a08c42e36c3a01d269cb10b5c263e77cf2f5a9" alt=""
1 CPU
Intel:353
AMD:385
2 CPU
Intel:658
AMD:722
SUPER PI,也是目前Intel方面拥有最大优势的软体
Intel
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3278c/3278c7743ecead3047f6ee98b5eaf0e2cd269797" alt=""
AMD
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1fd1/f1fd1148cd378d938e0fad9adbf08cfba3ef96ea" alt=""
Intel:22m 30.921s
AMD:29m 57.312s
EVEREST 快取与记忆体效能
Intel
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4052/d4052579f242bdc17b76033016a3b7510c359735" alt=""
AMD
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10411/104117ebf3b4028dc3c9ca3e2d9221ddc0c6e64d" alt=""
Memory
Intel:7680/4861/5426 MB/s 58.6ns
AMD:8005/7271/6130 MB/s 47.1ns
记忆体方面是AMD的长处,虽然只运作DDRII 746,不过效能全部胜过Intel DDRII800的频宽
CPU Mark
Intel:298
AMD:303
3DMARK2006
Intel
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77b95/77b9529a909734a9faf1f246d0143c4e6c8ca527" alt=""
AMD
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ae04/4ae04aa92c4479140352734643f47e7d3979c1cd" alt=""
CPU Source
Intel:1843
AMD:1924
TMPGEnc 3.0 XPress
Intel
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d955d/d955d19a3ab2f3f22305840c07fefc55a1e509c4" alt=""
AMD
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3242d/3242d1b18b18b077569221520d8f4a2bf897bb65" alt=""
Intel:01:14.51
AMD:01:17:32
提出两点小弟个人的观念
第一点,先前有提到,以K8的架构与C2D的效能对比,大约时脉差400Mhz左右即可打平
第二点,因为架构的不同,K8最佳效能大约落在512K,C2D最佳效能约在2MB,再加大对效能并没有太大的帮助
上一代的P4 3G对决K8 3000+,当时双方也以200美金左右来做主流产品比较
可惜的是P4 3G效能并无法超越K8 1.8G,P4超频后增进效能也比K8还要少
AMD在这几个月的价格战相当的清醒
若以一样的价格却能+400Mhz的时脉产品,来与Intel C2D对打
将有不相上下甚至超越C2D的效能出现
不过超频后时脉与效能方面依然是现在Intel C2D的优势,一般可达到3.4~3.8G左右的极限
AM2刚导入65nm制程,极限时脉进而拉到3.1G左右,若可以再拉到3.3G,可以有利于拉进双方的效能差距
AMD藉着产品线的低价格与主机板售价也比较低,是比较有利的地方
不过最主要还是要良率的提升与新架构的研发,才能更有力地改善目前的劣势
总而言之,两方阵营的较劲,消费者一定能得到某些的好处
两款处理器超频方面的表现,相信网路上有非常多相关的资料可供参考
让我们期待Intel/AMD下一波的效能/价格战:)